<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Code Quality game</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sickenger.com/2010/06/the-code-quality-game/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sickenger.com/2010/06/the-code-quality-game/</link>
	<description>A blog about code, coding and coders.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 22:23:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonar &#187; Sonar in the news</title>
		<link>http://www.sickenger.com/2010/06/the-code-quality-game/comment-page-1/#comment-586</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonar &#187; Sonar in the news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 13:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sickenger.com/?p=115#comment-586</guid>
		<description>[...] The Code Quality game By Ricki Sickenger, 4 June 2010 Most programmers think they can recognize good code and a lot of them think they produce good code, but the sad truth is that not a lot of programmers actually do. Between time constraints, feature creep, and laziness, programmers hardly ever end up producing super quality code. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Code Quality game By Ricki Sickenger, 4 June 2010 Most programmers think they can recognize good code and a lot of them think they produce good code, but the sad truth is that not a lot of programmers actually do. Between time constraints, feature creep, and laziness, programmers hardly ever end up producing super quality code. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

